Cultural Relativism and Whistleblowing Essay

pardon using the ethics of cultural relativism the advantages and disadvantages of whistling blowing ethnic relativism is the principle regarding the beliefs, values, and pr twistices of a civilization from the viewpoint of that flori ending itself (Chegg.com 2012). It is the concept that the brilliance of a particular cultural desire varies from one order of magnitude or societal subgroup to an other and that honourable and moral standards be relative to what a particular monastic order or culture believes to be unplayful or bad, right or vilify. In other words, right and wrong are culture-specific what is considered moral in one society whitethorn be considered immoral in another, and, since no universal standard of holiness exists, no one has the right to venture another societys customs. consort to Philosophy All About.org (2012) the view that the wide-ranging moral or ethical systems are all equally valid is found on the idea that there is no ultimate standar d of entire or evil so every concept just about right and wrong is a product of society. Therefore, any opinion on morality or ethics is theater to the cultural perspective of each person.Ultimately, this agent that no moral or ethical system hatful be considered the best, or worst, and no particular moral or ethical position pot rattling be considered right or wrong. Cultural perspective therefore can uphold us understand why certain(p) litigates are considered right or wrong by a particular culture. The actions existence referred to include the act of go blowing. Boatwright (2009 90) defines the act whistle blowing as the release of info by a member or former member of an brass that is examine of illegal and/or immoral air in the organisation or subscribe to in the organisation that is not in the public interest.Nadler and Schulman (2006) assert that whistle blowing is elaborately linked to ethics in that it represents a persons understanding, at a deep level, th at an action his or her organisation is taking is taking is harmful and that it interferes with bulks rights or is unfair or detracts from the common good. The question therefore from a cultural relativism perspective is, through which cultures lens is the common good being viewed. If in the prevailing culture whistle blowing is a common and unimpeachable practice an atmosphere where the advantages of whistle blowing has been cultivated. harmonise to Trimborn (2012) the most important of the advantages is that whistle-blowing practically ends long-standing fault that would have otherwise continued. Organisations who encourage a whistle blowing culture, promote transparent expression and effective, clear communication. More importantly, whistle blowing can protect the organizations clients. Trimborn (2012) cites the compositors cuticle of a infirmary employing a bite of negligent staff members. Other, more ethically inclined, employees would need to flummox such issues to th e hospitals attention, protecting the organization from manageable lawsuits or severe mishaps resulting in a patients demise. In the case of clear workplace violations of health and base hit regulations, or breach of employment laws, workers are protected and their rights upheld. With regard to research or technical issues, whistleblowers whitethorn cite inhering memos and other documentation to prove doubts existed about a product (such as a cover-up of certain medication dangers) or that false research results were knowingly published.Whistle-blowers often highlight reliablety concerns regarding cars or other products, thus protecting an unsuspecting public. Whistle-blowing upholds the law, protects many an(prenominal) from the impact of wrongdoing, reveals the truth and prevents further wrongdoing. In cultures where whistle-blowing is frowned upon devastating consequences can be visited upon the whistle blower. Trimborn (2012) reveals some of whistle blowings nix repercuss ions. Firstly, it can bring termination of the whistle-blowers services by the organization. It would be difficult to remain, no guinea pig how excusable the decision to reveal illegalities and no matter how much the revelations would actually benefit others. Secondly, big-time revelations could bring down the organization causing everyone to drop their telephone lines.Thirdly, the whistle-blower can get stigmatized as disloyal and be discredited in some way. Fourthly, the organization and sometimes colleagues may exact some form of retaliation on the whistle-blower in retribution. Thus, the whistle-blower is somehow blamed for the wrongdoing and fired without an opportunity for vindication. In communities, the whistle-blower and family may be subject to hostile treatment, viewed as acting out of self-interest with a view to gaining advancement at others expense.In conclusion, unless culture, practice and the law indicate that it is safe and accepted for whistle-blowers to rais e a reliable concern about corruption or illegality, workers will assume that they attempt victimisation, losing their job or damaging their career. They even risk being cast out or ostracised by the communities they emanate from. In cultures where a safety net for whistle-blowers exists the whistle-blower is tag as a person of legality who has the backbone to do what is right no matter what. It lets others know the whistle-blower can be trusted to deal with others honestly. It similarly limits the effects of intimidation tactics knowing to sway whistle-blowers from taking appropriate action where necessary (Young 2007).